Ola Jordan, the former professional dancer from *Strictly Come Dancing*, 

has recently shared her thoughts about the show’s judging panel, specifically targeting Craig Revel Horwood, one of the longest-standing judges on the show.

According to Ola, Craig has “lost his sparkle” and should be replaced with a new judge who would bring more excitement and “spice” to the panel.

Her comments have sparked attention and raised questions about the current state of the judging panel on the popular BBC dance competition show.

Ola Jordan, who was a professional dancer on *Strictly Come Dancing* for many years, is no stranger to the intense and often highly scrutinized world of competitive dancing.

Her tenure on the show, which saw her partnering with a number of celebrity contestants,

gave her unique insight into both the challenges and thrills of performing in front of millions of viewers and a panel of judges.

While the judges, including Craig Revel Horwood, have always been a major part of the show’s dynamic, Ola’s remarks reflect her belief that the panel is in need of a refresh.

Craig Revel Horwood, known for his acerbic wit and sharp critiques, has been a key figure on *Strictly Come Dancing* since its inception in 2004.

His sharp comments and no-nonsense approach to evaluating the celebrity dancers have made him both loved and hated by the show’s audience.

However, Ola Jordan believes that Craig’s approach, once considered a signature feature of the judging panel, has started to lose its charm.

She argues that Craig’s harsh critiques, which once brought a certain edge to the show, now come across as less impactful, and that he no longer brings the same level of excitement and drama that he once did.

Ola’s suggestion is that a new judge, one who could inject more “spice” into the judging panel, would be a welcome change.

She did not specify exactly who she had in mind as a potential replacement, but her comments seem to suggest that someone with a fresh perspective and a more lively and engaging presence would help reinvigorate the show.

This could mean a judge who is perhaps more willing to embrace the fun and theatricality of the performances, someone who brings a bit more flair and enthusiasm to the table.

Ola’s criticism of Craig is not just about his style of judging but about the overall energy he contributes to the panel, which she feels has waned in recent years.

It’s important to note that Ola’s comments are likely influenced by her own experience as a former professional dancer on the show.

As someone who was part of the *Strictly* family for many years, she has witnessed firsthand how the judges interact with the dancers and how their feedback can shape the public’s perception of both the performances and the contestants.

While *Strictly Come Dancing* is undoubtedly a competition, it is also a form of entertainment, and the judges play a crucial role in maintaining the show’s high-energy atmosphere.

Ola may feel that the panel, in its current form, lacks the dynamism that once made it so compelling.

Ola Jordan’s remarks come at a time when there has been increasing scrutiny of the judging panel, particularly in light of the changing dynamics within the show itself.

In recent seasons, there has been a growing debate about whether the panel has become too predictable and whether the judging itself still holds the same weight with viewers.

The introduction of new judges in recent years has brought a different flavor to the show, and some fans have expressed the opinion that the panel could benefit from further changes to ensure that the show remains exciting and unpredictable.

For many viewers, the relationship between the judges and the contestants is a vital part of the *Strictly Come Dancing* experience.

While some may enjoy Craig Revel Horwood’s sharp-edged criticisms, others may feel that a more varied approach to judging would bring something fresh to the show.

Ola’s suggestion of replacing Craig with a judge who brings more “spice” to the table seems to be a call for a shift in tone, possibly one that focuses more on fun and engagement than on overly critical assessments.

Of course, replacing a long-time judge like Craig Revel Horwood is no easy task. His status as one of the most recognizable faces of *Strictly Come Dancing* makes him a fixture of the show, and any changes to the judging panel would likely spark significant public debate.

However, Ola’s comments point to an ongoing conversation about how *Strictly Come Dancing* can evolve while still maintaining the qualities that have made it so beloved by audiences.

Whether or not Craig Revel Horwood is replaced, Ola’s remarks highlight the fact that the judges’ dynamic is a crucial element of the show’s continued success, and that maintaining a balance of sharp critique, entertainment, and enthusiasm is key to keeping the show’s magic alive.

In conclusion, Ola Jordan’s recent criticism of Craig Revel Horwood suggests that she believes the *Strictly Come Dancing* judging panel could benefit from a change, with the introduction of a new judge who could bring more excitement and “spice” to the show.

Her comments reflect a desire for fresh energy and engagement in the panel, which she feels has diminished over time.

Whether this leads to any changes in the show’s lineup remains to be seen, but it has certainly sparked a conversation about how the judges can continue to evolve to keep *Strictly* as entertaining and dynamic as ever.