THE BBC has issued a statement on Huw Edwards describing his “betrayal” as the disgraced star was spared jail today.

The former Beeb presenter, 63, previously admitted three charges of “making” indecent photographs after he was sent 41 illegal images by convicted paedophile Alex Williams over WhatsApp.

Huw Edwards was handed six months’ imprisonment, suspended for two years

His mugshot was revealed after he avoided jail today

Alex Williams sent Edwards the images

Court artist drawing of Edwards in the dock at Westminster Magistrates’ Court
At Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Monday, Edwards was handed six months’ imprisonment, suspended for two years.

And a BBC spokesperson said after its former broadcaster Edwards was sentenced: “We are appalled by his crimes.

“He has betrayed not just the BBC, but audiences who put their trust in him.”

The court heard how Edwards told Williams “go on” when asked if he wanted “naughty pics and vids” of somebody described as “yng (sic)”.

Edwards also paid Williams hundreds of pounds after he sent him pornographic images.

But his defence barrister Philip Evans KC said the broadcaster did not make payments to Williams in order to receive indecent images of children.

The prosecution said Williams asked Edwards for a “Christmas gift after all the hot videos”.

Prosecutor Ian Hope said: “Alex Williams says he wants some Air Force 1 trainers that cost around £100, and Mr Edwards offers to send him £200.”

Of the indecent images he received, the estimated age of most of the children was between 13 and 15, but one was aged between seven and nine.

Mr Evans said Edwards “recognises that he has betrayed the priceless trust and faith of so many people”.

He added that Edwards is “truly sorry” for how he had “damaged his family and his loved ones” and for committing the offences.

Sentencing Edwards, Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring told the broadcaster: “Perhaps it does not need saying but you are of previous good character.”

EDWARDS UNMASKED

By Scarlet Howes | Sun Investigations Team

THE mum of a teen sent vile messages by Huw Edwards has hit out at the disgraced BBC host in an open letter.

She tells him he caused “immense pain and suffering” to her and her son in the pursuit of his “sick pleasure”.

Edwards, 62, is due to be sentenced today over indecent images of children as young as seven found on his mobile phone.

Seven of the 41 he admitted to receiving were in Category A — the most serious classification.

The mother of the young man who Edwards paid tens of thousands of pounds to in return for sexually explicit pictures says the former news anchor should be locked up.

She writes: “Edwards has exploited very young children for his own sick ends and in my mind should go to prison.

“It breaks my heart as a mother to know that the man who groomed and controlled my son also shared the worst kind of child abuse picture.

“No paedophile who enjoys pictures of young kids should be free on the street.”

Edwards is facing a possible jail sentence when he appears in court today and could spend the rest of his life on the sex offenders register.

The anguished mum of Huw Edwards’ young victim has told the shamed BBC star: “All we cared about was stopping you.”

She poured her heart out in an open letter after she exposed the shamed News at Ten presenter for sending her teenage son tens of thousands of pounds in return for ­sexually explicit pictures.

The judge said he accepts Edwards had been of “exemplary” good character “having enjoyed a very successful career in the media”.

“It’s obvious that until now you were very highly regarded by the public,” he continued, adding that Edwards was “perhaps the most recognised newsreader-journalist”.

“It is not an exaggeration to say your long-earned reputation is in tatters,” the judge said.

He also told Edwards he would be subject to 25 rehabilitation sessions and be placed on the sex offender treatment programme for 40 days.

The final indecent image was sent in August 2021, a category A film featuring a young boy, with convicted paedophile Williams telling the newsreader the child was “quite young looking” and that he had more images which were illegal.

Addressing the exchange while opening the case to the court, Mr Hope said: “Alex Williams says he has some ‘naughty pics and vids unsure if you’d like’.

“Mr Edwards tells him to ‘go on’ and Alex Williams states ‘yng (sic)’.

“Mr Edwards again tells him to ‘go on’ and Alex Williams sends a category A moving image showing a male child aged around seven to nine…”

By Scarlet Howes

NIGHT after night he sternly delivered the most important news to the nation, with his authoritative style winning countless awards.

But away from his famous desk, as we have discovered, Huw Edwards was a manipulative paedophile who used the same pattern of behaviour time and time again to feed his relentless desires.

Some 437 days since the Sun’s bombshell front page – Edwards today appeared in court to learn his fate, his once glittering career in ruins.

Our exclusive that he paid a youngster thousands of pounds for sexual pictures made headlines around the globe and set into motion a series of events which plunged the BBC into crisis.

And Edwards – at the time the BBC’s highest earning newsreader – never again appeared on our screens.

Today, a court heard Edwards paid a younger convicted paedophile £1,500 for child sex images and videos of children which he described as “amazing”.

The case centred on messages between sex offender Alex Williams, who was a teen when they struck up a relationship, and 63-year-old Edwards.

We must be clear, the facts of that case are unrelated to our original story.

But there are some alarming similarities in his exchanges with both young people – and a pattern of deeply disturbing behaviour.

He made contact with both on social media, messaged them on WhatsApp, harassed them for pictures, and then gave them money.

There were kisses involved and Christmas presents given.

Chillingly, he even bought both of them, who are decades younger, a pair of trainers.

And all in exchange for sexual pictures.

Cash was used as leverage to the men, one homeless, the other a student, who could only dream of earning his top salary.

What The Sun uncovered was a pattern of behaviour and had we not done so Edwards’ could well have remained undetected.

“Mr Edwards inquires where the video is from and Alex Williams says an image sharing group on another social media platform which they have both also used, Telegram.

“Alex Williams says the subject is ‘quite yng looking’ to which Mr Edwards responds it ‘can be deceptive’ and asks if he has ‘any more?’”

Mr Evans told the court: “The defendant has no memory of actually viewing any particular image.”

The defence KC also said Edwards “did not gain any gratification” from indecent images.

Overall, the charges cover a period between December 2020 and August 2021.

Speaking about the money Edwards had sent to Williams, Mr Hope said: “It is clear from the face of the WhatsApp chat recovered that a deal of the chat between Alex Williams and Mr Edwards was sexual in nature.

“It is also clear that Mr Edwards was paying not insignificant sums of money – low hundreds of pounds on an occasional basis – to Alex Williams which Mr Williams directly asked for on several occasions, as gifts or presents, apparently off the back of sending pornographic images to Mr Edwards, about which images they chatted.

“Alex Williams has stated that the money was more generally to support him at university and amounted to around £1,000 to £1,500.”

Following his guilty pleas, the BBC admitted it was informed that the former TV presenter had been arrested in November, but continued to employ him for around five months until he left on medical advice.

It has asked Edwards to repay the £200,000 salary he has received since his arrest.

BBC director-general Tim Davie said the money should be returned and that the corporation will “explore” the legal process if Edwards refuses.

How are indecent images defined and categorised?

Under section 1 of Protection of Children Act 1978, it is an offence to possess indecent photographs of children.

The images are categorised under three groups ranging from A – the most serious – to C.